3 ms·
And why not train it on microsoft windows and office code?
by LtWorf 4y ago
And why not train it on microsoft windows and office code?
- robertlagrant 4y agoThat is a rather good question.
- megous 4y agoBecause then your Re4ct code would look like this: export default class USERCOMPONENT extends REACTCOMPONENT<IUSER, {}> { constructor (oProps: IUSER){ super(oProps); } render() { return ( <div> <h1>User Component</h1> Hello, <b>{This.oProps.sName}</b> <br/> You are <b>{This.oProps.dwAge} years old</b> <br/> You live at: <b>{This.oProps.sAddress}</b> <br/> You were born: <b>{This.oProps.oDoB.ToDateString()}</b> </div> ); } }
- dustedcodes 4y agoEasy pal, we don't want to multiply that shyte.
- xfer 4y agoExactly, it would actually benefit many C/C++ programmers. Some components of NT are very high quality, why not wash their license if the aim is to empower the programmers and also make some profit?
- logifail 4y ago> And why not train it on microsoft windows and office code? As a thought experiment, if one were to train a model on purely leaked and/or stolen source code, would the use of model step effectively "launder" the code and make later partial reuse legit?
- LtWorf 4y agoOnly if it's not microsoft's leaked code, I guess :)