3 ms·
I take it seriously. You don't. That's the thing about this stuff: it's voluntary. That's the point the above commenters are trying to make. We don't need a co
by betwixthewires 4y ago
I take it seriously. You don't.
That's the thing about this stuff: it's voluntary. That's the point the above commenters are trying to make. We don't need a consensus of you all to do what we want, and if you don't want to be involved, don't.
- woodruffw 4y agoI take it seriously enough; I have a civic interest in harm reduction in this area. “Voluntary” cuts it when you’re talking amongst yourselves, but again: this is a public forum, not one specially for your interests. I get to voice common sense objections; that’s the point of this place.
- betwixthewires 4y agoSure you get a voice. We can have a discussion. But the point being made above is that we need someone's respect, someone's consensus, someone's approval to do what we are doing. And to that I say if you don't like what we are doing don't get involved.
- woodruffw 4y ago> We can have a discussion. That's all this has ever been! > And to that I say if you don't like what we are doing don't get involved. This, of course, only holds as far as cryptocurrencies remain a non-risk to most "main street" investors. But they're creeping towards that group (as the next biggest free pool of capital), and I have a civic interest in those people not losing their shirts. No man is an island, &c.