3 ms·
The chilling effect of this decision is something everybody who uses open source software should be worried about.
by guitarbill 4y ago
The chilling effect of this decision is something everybody who uses open source software should be worried about.
- FeepingCreature 4y agoI'm worried that this will harm open source, but in a different way: lots of people switching to unfree "no commercial use at all" licenses, special exemptions in licenses, and so on. I'm also worried that it'll harm scientific progress by criminalizing a deeply harmless and commonplace activity such as "learning from open code" when it's AIs that do it. And of course retarding the progress of AI code assistance, a vital component of scaling up programmer productivity. From an AI safety perspective, I'm also worried it will accelerate the transition to self-learning code, ie. the model both generating and learning from source code, which is a crucial step on the way to general artificial intelligence that we are not ready for.
- carom 4y agoHorrible framing. AI is not learning from code. The model is a function. The AI is a derivative work of its training material. They built a program based on open source code and failed to open source it. They also built a program that outputs open source code without tracking the license. This isn't a human who read something and distilled a general concept. This is a program that spits out a chain of tokens. This is more akin to a human who copied some copywritten material verbatim.
- FeepingCreature 4y agoThe brain is a function. You're positing a distinction without a difference.