8 ms·
I do remember reading that so I should have specified that in its current state it shouldn't be there. Or at least we shouldn't depend on it being there
by xeromal 4y ago
I do remember reading that so I should have specified that in its current state it shouldn't be there. Or at least we shouldn't depend on it being there
- genocidicbunny 4y agoUnfortunately, people were not so forward-thinking when exploitation of the sea began, and thus we are now stuck with the situation that we do depend on it being there. The damage from it going away would be pretty major, both ecologically, but also in terms of economics for that area. It's a fairly productive area for agriculture, and a lot of that would be impacted. More than it is already.