6 ms·
It’s not against the law! I agree that she shouldn’t do it and that the law should change so that she can’t. But presently-legal congressional sleaze is not rel
by KerrAvon 4y ago
It’s not against the law! I agree that she shouldn’t do it and that the law should change so that she can’t. But presently-legal congressional sleaze is not relevant to the discussion here.
- hayst4ck 4y agoWhat does "rule of law" mean to you? What kind of other "rule of ____" exist? How might you determine how you are ruled?