3 ms·
SCO v. IBM[1] included claims of sections as small as "…ranging from five to ten to fifteen lines of code in multiple places that are of issue…" in some of the
by SAI_Peregrinus 4y ago
SCO v. IBM[1] included claims of sections as small as "…ranging from five to ten to fifteen lines of code in multiple places that are of issue…" in some of the individual claims of the case.
[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_Group,_Inc._v._International_Business_Machines_Corp https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SCO_Group,_Inc._v._Internation....
- dataflow 4y agoThe "..." part you redacted out explicitly said "it is many different sections of code". It was (quite obviously) not one or two 5-line blocks of code, let alone "simple" ones like FizzBuzz.
- AmericanChopper 4y agoSo your claim is that the code in the OP tweet is actually not copyrightable, and it would only become a copyright violation if you also copied many additional code blocks from the same copyrighted work?