4 ms·

> 90% of nameplate capacity doesn't mean much at all if you can't afford to finish building the thing. Tell you what: get back to me when someone actually buil

> 90% of nameplate capacity doesn't mean much at all if you can't afford to finish building the thing. Tell you what: get back to me when someone actually builds one of your fantasy solar power plants at a competitive cost (which will involve multiplying the nameplate capacity by 9). But we need to keep civilization running until then. Sorry.

tchaffee 4y ago
> get back to me when someone actually builds one of your fantasy solar power plants at a competitive cost (which will involve multiplying the nameplate capacity by 9). Hey! I'm already back with proof positive results! NextEra energy has installed over 45,500Mw of renewable energy and their earnings per share are 1.30. This all happened while the latest nuclear build put the builder into bankruptcy, yo! They are - get this - the world's largest utility company. Their future plans do include continuing running existing nuclear plants. But: they have zero plans to build new nuclear. Their plans do include building LOADS of new solar. Can you explain why a for-profit company would be taking this direction if solar is not competitive? You cannot. Solar is getting cheaper and more efficient by the year. It's the smarter choice if you are into making money. Nuclear is the smarter choice if you want to declare bankruptcy. Lots more where NextEra came from. > But we need to keep civilization running until then. Sorry. We are. 1/5 of all the solar installed in the US was installed just last year. Your beloved nuclear is slowing fading into history while solar plants go up everywhere you look. Sorry! Even France knows the deal and will rely far less on nuclear in the coming years. Didn't you say we were done here? Twice? What happened?