3 ms·
It appears to also be called the "abstract machine"[1]. C semantics do not work "directly on the hardware" but instead on an abstract machine that is then conv
by hmfrh 4y ago
It appears to also be called the "abstract machine"[1].
C semantics do not work "directly on the hardware" but instead on an abstract machine that is then converted to the actual hardware.
It most often comes up when talking about undefined behavior and pointer behavior.
Some assorted reading, mostly in the context of Rust and C:
https://blog.regehr.org/archives/213 https://blog.regehr.org/archives/213
https://raphlinus.github.io/programming/rust/2018/08/17/undefined-behavior.html https://raphlinus.github.io/programming/rust/2018/08/17/unde...
https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2018/07/24/pointers-and-bytes.html https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2018/07/24/pointers-and-bytes.html
https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2017/06/06/MIR-semantics.html https://www.ralfj.de/blog/2017/06/06/MIR-semantics.html
[1]: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53100198/what-is-the-precise-relationship-between-c-and-its-abstract-machine https://stackoverflow.com/questions/53100198/what-is-the-pre...
- habibur 4y agoTo be fair, Assembly once worked directly on the hardware. On modern machines it doesn't.
- whimsicalism 4y agoI don't think it is fair to conflate the "abstract machine" of C with the virtual machine. There is no software virtualization at work when running C code, it is compiled directly to assembly.