4 ms·
And the original benchmarks of bun vs deno had bun using a native-code http server against a deno using a js-code http server, afaik. And the bun-specific-fork
by asojfdowgh 4y ago
And the original benchmarks of bun vs deno had bun using a native-code http server against a deno using a js-code http server, afaik.
And the bun-specific-fork-of-react vs deno + normal react, was suspect too.
- Jarred 4y agoWhen you import “react-dom/server” in Node, it actually loads “react-dom/server.node.js” When you import “react-dom/server” in browsers or Deno, it loads “react-dom/server.browser.js” When you import “react-dom/server” in Bun, it will load “react-dom/server.bun.js”. https://twitter.com/sebmarkbage/status/1560609478227030016 https://twitter.com/sebmarkbage/status/1560609478227030016
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- asojfdowgh 4y agoBut what does an upstream target do for a Vue developer? a Svelte developer? a Preact developer? etc etc. Its not so much of a useful thing to just focus so much on what you use to benchmark. Reminds of: https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/28/nvidia_tpc_benchmark/ https://www.theregister.com/2021/01/28/nvidia_tpc_benchmark/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/futuremark-reverses-nvidia-didnt-cheat/ https://www.zdnet.com/article/futuremark-reverses-nvidia-did... Like, you wouldn't be impressed if it was react bun vs preact deno, right?