5 ms·
Without a doubt you could give some great insights and a lot of useful information. But to answer your question; No, you alone could not write an objective ency
by andrewfelix 15y ago
Without a doubt you could give some great insights and a lot of useful information. But to answer your question; No, you alone could not write an objective encyclopedia article on the subject.
- dotBen 15y agoOk, so if a bunch of folks write about a given scientist - 2 being friends of the subject, the rest not - then by this logic the resultant copy they create as a collective should be objective. Great, problem solved.
- eropple 15y agoSo, anyone who has any real connection to a topic shouldn't be writing about what they know on Wikipedia. Awesome. Man, I wish Citizendium hadn't fell apart. It didn't venerate nonsense.
- andrewfelix 15y agoWhere did I suggest they shouldn't be writing about it? All I said was alone a single source with a biased outlook can't offer an objective view. "Citizendium hadn't fell apart"? Hyperbole in the extreme.