I disagree about separate weights. I don't trust judgement of somebody gullible. But it's related to the problem of what is trust. E.g. I may trust somebody to

I disagree about separate weights. I don't trust judgement of somebody gullible. But it's related to the problem of what is trust. E.g. I may trust somebody to create a secure software, but I wouldn't trust her take care of my dog. So at the beginning I thought there should be dimensionality of trust. Currently I think it overly complicates things not to mention the problem of categories. So trust means whatever it means for you and people you trust and specific use cases can perhaps be covered with multiple identities instead. Since you've spent some time on the problem if you have any other insights/ideas/problems I'd be delighted to hear them. There's a lot of interesting dynamics. It should influence politics a lot. And at the beginning I thought maybe a crime scene too making it harder to infiltrate gangs, but then I realized that as a criminal I wouldn't dare make a list of my accomplices on a device which can end up in hands of law enforcement.