3 ms·
I love LogSeq and am deeply impressed by what they have achieved in very short time. The embedded PDF reader is quite good and the option to add comments direct
by karencarits 4y ago
I love LogSeq and am deeply impressed by what they have achieved in very short time. The embedded PDF reader is quite good and the option to add comments directly as blocks is amazing. Making queries is still a bit hard for beginners and not as flexible as in e.g. TiddlyWiki (https://tiddlywiki.com/ https://tiddlywiki.com/), but it is becoming increasingly powerful
There are, however, some annoyances left; for example, the support for ordinary checkboxes (not todo elements) is surprisingly limited for a software based on lists
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 4y agoThere are ordinary checkboxes? I keep sticking LATER on all my entries of todo lists
- karencarits 4y agoWell, yes and no. You can use the todo system, as you mention, by adding TODO or LATER or DOING or something. And in a block, you can also do something like - This is an item * [ ] This is an open checkbox * [X] This is a checked checkbox and it will render as expected. However, you can not write - [ ] This is a checkbox and have it rendered as a checkbox, which I think is a bit strange
- Fire-Dragon-DoL 4y agoOh I see, that's interesting, I only tested the second approach, that's why I didn't realize you could render actual checkboxes. I just got used to apply LATER everywhere. Thank you for expanding this