2 ms·
It was an optimization when RAM was too expensive to keep a full working set live.
by kevin_thibedeau 4y ago
It was an optimization when RAM was too expensive to keep a full working set live.
- shawnz 4y agoNo, that's exactly what I'm saying: swap was never meant to let you run workloads bigger than your physical memory capacity.
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]