4 ms·
I think that's the opposite of what's implied here. They're implying CDC is being infiltrated by the people is is supposed to be regulating. In your example, th
by jvanderbot 4y ago
I think that's the opposite of what's implied here. They're implying CDC is being infiltrated by the people is is supposed to be regulating. In your example, the troops were not being infiltrated by journalists to circumvent the armies control over journalists.
- stjohnswarts 4y agoThe point is nepotism, not a point for point identical situation. The problem is that groups are cross pollinating in a situation that should be independent and by its nature adversarial a lot of the time.
- perfecthjrjth 4y agoWhat is happening is collusion. This collusion is legal too; no amount of laws on conflicts of interest will fix this.