3 ms·
But it doesn’t control it - he keeps taking more every few years - and you think he should do it unchallenged which would make it faster and faster. Controllin
by chrisseaton 4y ago
But it doesn’t control it - he keeps taking more every few years - and you think he should do it unchallenged which would make it faster and faster.
Controlling it is stopping him taking land, not allowing it.
And do you have any idea how to eradicate the cancer of Putin long term? If not then you’re delaying with no way to stop, so he’ll eventually get everything he wants.
- kcplate 4y ago> And do you have any idea how to eradicate the cancer of Putin long term? I do actually, this particular cancer will certainly not last longer than about 20 more years, probably even significantly less if the news reports are accurate. Keep the patient alive, this cancer goes away in time. If the problem is a single man with an already limited lifespan, why not wait it out? Why kill the patient to cure a temporary cancer?
- chrisseaton 4y ago> If the problem is a single man Do you think there's nobody who will take power in Russia after he dies? I think there will be, and I think he'll be similar.
- kcplate 4y agoOf course there will be. I mentioned that specifically in the other conversation. It’s precisely the reason why creating a worldwide conflict out of this is pointless. The problem isn’t one man, it’s our nature. There have always been tyrants and likely will always be tyrants unless we as a species can one day deny our nature. We will not permanently fix this if Putin is out of power even at the cost of a worldwide conflict.