4 ms·
Just out of curiosity - why is this such a big deal? Personally, as long as the page has a good UI, I couldn't care less if it is being prerendered or not.
by tail_exchange 4y ago
Just out of curiosity - why is this such a big deal? Personally, as long as the page has a good UI, I couldn't care less if it is being prerendered or not.
- Zak 4y agoThe comment you replied to says > if I choose to let it run at all, which I won't if I can avoid it. It's not rare for people with a security/privacy background to only allow whitelisted sites to run JS.
- deworms 4y agoAnd - what's the point? Websites that want to track you will track you anyway, there's a whole array of technologies that will let them to, and won't display anything to you if you don't run JS. Security objections are pointless, it's not 2001, JS is not anything new, and it's not at all a security risk, browsers are sandboxed and well isolated.
- sneak 4y agoThe objections to JS on security grounds are not about tracking. Browsers doing JIT are not as isolated as you may wish them to be.