4 ms·
I seem to recall someone I knew who relied on them for sinkholing malware. He'd basically reverse engineer the command and control, write his own version, repor
by jamal-kumar 4y ago
I seem to recall someone I knew who relied on them for sinkholing malware. He'd basically reverse engineer the command and control, write his own version, report the domain (usually some gibberish like kfgrgerrkritptjfnfkdnfffkergb.com), buy it as soon as it went on the market, and then take over the botnet associated with it to disable the thing and report it to affected companies. Pretty sure his company doing this got bought out by looking glass. Looking that technique up it seems Kaspersky did some of this too at one point: https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2012_how-kaspersky-lab-and-crowdstrike-dismantled-the-second-hlux-kelihos-botnet-success-story https://www.kaspersky.com/about/press-releases/2012_how-kasp...
I'm not entirely sure how effective or relevant this kind of method is these days but I wouldn't be surprised if it was something you could still pull off now.
- metadat 4y agoDamn, that's badass, thanks for sharing this story. In hindsight it seems like an obvious good approach, but in reality this is such a clever idea to hijack via poisoning the system. I wouldn't have thought to try this. I dig!
- silisili 4y agoI worked at a registry when Conficker and co were big... you'd be amazed the amount of domain names we'd have to reserve every year to stay ahead of it. And that was just for the few tlds we ran.