3 ms·
It's actually a pretty reasonable way to read it (it's the way I read it as well). You are obviously using DNS now, and since almost all DNS traffic today is un
by SoftwareMaven 15y ago
It's actually a pretty reasonable way to read it (it's the way I read it as well). You are obviously using DNS now, and since almost all DNS traffic today is unencrypted, it is a reason assumption to believe your traffic is currently unencrypted†.
However, since you won't touch OpenDNS' encrypted DNS, the only logical reason for that is you feel unreviewed, encrypted DNS is more risky than the current unencrypted DNS.
† That assumption is where things may break down, of course. If you are already using DNSSec, then the reading becomes "I trust DNSSec more than OpenDNS' unreviewed client."
- peterwwillis 15y agoThis 'logical conclusion' assumes I would make a comparison between two completely different use cases: wanting to encrypt my dns traffic and not wanting to encrypt my dns traffic. Saying one is better than the other is stupid because they're completely different things.