3 ms·

Humans can perceive frame rates far above 30-60.

• SamoyedFurFluff 4y ago
  Can you tell me more? Can you cite me sources? (I’m not asking to challenge you I genuinely want to educate myself on this. Like I said I was going off of a casual Google search that told me humans don’t generally notice beyond 60 fps so there’s no point in significantly higher monitors. If this is wrong I’d like sources because the sources will educate me further where the real info is about this!)
  • taosx 4y ago
    Here is a video from Linus that poses that question. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OX31kZbAXsA
  • lillecarl 4y ago
    I blind tested my ex on my 144hz displays, setting variating combinations of refresh rates between two monitors where the options were 60, 120 and 144. She could always tell the difference between 60 and 120/144, the way she saw the difference between 120 and 144 was comparing the pointer trail. She didn't notice that animations were smoother though, so that's definitely trained. I hate myself so I run Linux on all my client machines, and if my display goes to 60 I notice by the first animation on my desktop (which is essentially only the start menu). If you're curious it's easy to set different refresh rates on your monitors and try it out for yourself, the 60hz thing is bogus. I also notice an awful lot of lag when movies have panoramic shots, they are less than 30hz. There are workarounds with computed frames in most modern tvs that help with this.