3 ms·

This article has the same 'checksum' as people talking about how their artistic college-roommates would clean their dirty artwork up so that they could cultivat

This article has the same 'checksum' as people talking about how their artistic college-roommates would clean their dirty artwork up so that they could cultivate a CV that Disney would approve. I'm wary for the day ML de-anonymizes a popular non-de-plum - someone carefully disguising their artwork to release their passion under one name, and their day-job art under another. Written and visual both seem susceptible to this as we follow the arrow of time. What happens to art when you literally cannot hide your name?

melony 4y ago
> I'm wary for the day ML de-anonymizes a popular non-de-plum - someone carefully disguising their artwork to release their passion under one name, and their day-job art under another. Written and visual both seem susceptible to this as we follow the arrow of time. Using the correct spelling of words would be a start in defending against such models *Nom de plume. Pen name.
- Zigurd 4y ago
  Or you just have a bias against the fruity aspects of writing smut
- junofan 4y ago
  Today’s author identification models usually use some sort of embedding, so uncorrected misspellings are probably a no-op.