4 ms·
The more nefarious one to me was when Archive scrubbed all of Taylor Lorenz's tweets[1]. Lorenz claims to be a journalist. She is employed by Jeff Bezos's WaP
by tenpies 4y ago
The more nefarious one to me was when Archive scrubbed all of Taylor Lorenz's tweets[1].
Lorenz claims to be a journalist. She is employed by Jeff Bezos's WaPo.
Her tweets are a matter of public record, but because they reveal what an absolutely horrible person she is and how her brand of "journalism" relies on internet terrorism and online persecution, they were scrubbed.
Google of course, did it parts too.
If you truly need to archive something, do not rely on the Internet Archive and their censorship.
---
[1] https://www.foxnews.com/media/taylor-lorenz-twitter-page-excluded-internet-archive https://www.foxnews.com/media/taylor-lorenz-twitter-page-exc...
- deleted 4y ago[deleted]
- boomboomsubban 4y agoIsn't this a simple DMCA takedown? Lorenz's tweets are her intellectual property, she has control over where they are rehosted and IA's hands are basically tied.