4 ms·
I "like" how the beginning of the segment states the "biggest impact" is gonna be on the fishing economy, not on the restaurants. I'd argue the biggest impact
by black_puppydog 4y ago
I "like" how the beginning of the segment states the "biggest impact" is gonna be on the fishing economy, not on the restaurants.
I'd argue the biggest impact is on... the crab population? Guess nobody really cares for those after all. In which case losing them serves us well.
- philosopher1234 4y agoWe are like coal to be burned as fuel for capital
- tenpies 4y agoNot quite. That is the carbon cycle. We just came along and put some faces on paper so we could stop killing each other over whose fishermen get to catch crab. Then we called it capitalism and pretended that our economic systems transcend natural science.
- moffkalast 4y agoThis kills the crab
- Sargos 4y ago> I'd argue the biggest impact is on... the crab population? The biggest impact of a lower crab population is a lower crab population. That's tautological, makes no sense, and why the article doesn't mention it. The decline in population already happened.
- tsol 4y agoTo be fair, news on the economy gets more clicks than news about falling animal populations. Just another perverse incentive that makes the system the way it is