> Are you saying Vattenfall did not shut down ringhals because they said they are not commercially viable? You are directly contradicting their own words Both

> Are you saying Vattenfall did not shut down ringhals because they said they are not commercially viable? You are directly contradicting their own words Both statements are true. They weren't commercially viable because if the extra taxes the government introduced. So yes they were shut down because they were too expensive, and yes the government indirectly shut them down by making them too expensive.