>but it seems far less outrageous than it does when presented without those details And yet people tend to ignore those details when it fits anti-Chinese propa

>but it seems far less outrageous than it does when presented without those details And yet people tend to ignore those details when it fits anti-Chinese propaganda. >Mao’s crimes Do you know what happened to the Gang of Four? And of course there is no “public discussion”, same way you don’t have public discussion in Japan about its nazi past. Like I said, a cultural thing. As for that prime minister - you could ask that same question regarding Gwangju. To me what matters is that he got prosecuted, which is rather shocking contrast compared to Kent State or most American massacres really - Americans tend to hold this subconscious belief that one can’t possibly prosecute its rulers.