If I use my influential speech to get you to cancel a project or to have it removed from every major streaming service, am I merely exercising in free speech or

If I use my influential speech to get you to cancel a project or to have it removed from every major streaming service, am I merely exercising in free speech or also using social pressure to prevent you from speaking? The point here isn't that people are uninformed (that's bad, but obviously allows allowed) - it's that one group is demanding that something does not air and is claiming sole moral and cultural authority to do this. While it's their right to claim this, the consequences for everyone else are that they lose the ability to actually make the choices of which film they want to see on streaming services because another group has removed that ability. Why shouldn't the film air, and if it's terrible and awful beyond belief in every way, then the creators will forever have their names sullied? The reasoning here isn't even whether the film is good, but who the creator is, and not even because they've done anything bad really but because the single person the critics have focused on happens to be white. How is this not insane?