3 ms·

>For instance, executive action is regularly challenged in the US, and successfully so. And? How's that different from China?

• kube-system 4y ago
  China does not have a judiciary independent of the ruling party.
  • deleted 4y ago
    [deleted]
  • trasz 4y ago
    [citation needed] US, on the other hand, definitely doesn't - everyone from the top is chosen by politicians.
    • kube-system 4y ago
      > [citation needed] I’m not claiming anything controversial. The SPC openly says that they follow the guidance of the Party. https://qz.com/886665/xi-jinping-promised-legal-reform-in-china-but-forget-about-judicial-independence/ https://qz.com/886665/xi-jinping-promised-legal-reform-in-ch... The US has a judiciary comprising of judges picked by politicians from two competing parties.
      • trasz 4y ago
        >the guidance of the Party Which, translated to western terms, is like guidance of the Department of Justice. >politicians from two competing parties Here the term “party” means something completely different from above. If you imagine the political system as layers, China places boundaries between those layers differently from the West, and if you continue to use the terms for those layers (“party”) without realizing this, you’ll arrive at silly conclusions.