> If you don't think professional conduct means accurately representing a course of treatment and it's risk I don't know what to say to you. What if, you know,

> If you don't think professional conduct means accurately representing a course of treatment and it's risk I don't know what to say to you. What if, you know, accurately representing a course of treatment required contradicting CDC/FDA? Say, suppose you’re a medical researcher, doing science, and you find that CDC/FDA are completely wrong on some count (as they have been many, many times in the past). Are they supposed to just repeat CDC-blessed falsehoods that they know to be false? Do you want to institute an office of the arbiters of truth, such that it is legally forbidden to disagree with them?