>I'm concerned about both, so I'm confused how my comment is "flawed". Well I already said how I was interpreting it. So I'm confused as to why you're confused

>I'm concerned about both, so I'm confused how my comment is "flawed". Well I already said how I was interpreting it. So I'm confused as to why you're confused. You are presumably aware that people can interpret things differently to what you may have intended. So when someone points out the failings in that interpretation, you should be able to understand it is based on that interpretation and that I'm not psychic and able to see what you meant to say whilst inserting a strawman argument of what I knew you didn't mean. To interpret further. And this is again my interpretation. You seem not to be able to empathise with people whose livelihoods are being threatened, the crabs, or me in this conversation.