you benefited from your spot in what you describe as a wealthy high school, and we read into that better teachers, more extra programs, etc. (not a challenge or

you benefited from your spot in what you describe as a wealthy high school, and we read into that better teachers, more extra programs, etc. (not a challenge or a criticism) in general though (i.e. not in public school), taking a spot in a program denies that spot to somebody else. The human capacity for a sense of fairness and rooting for the underdog on the one hand says "great, it's nice that it happened for you!". But in the types of equity/equality decisions that are being made in general, what happened to the other person who didn't get the benefit you got? what if she was "better qualified" or "more deserving" or "would have benefited society at large more"?