4 ms·
Their statement actually isn't nearly as bad as you imply. They mention that there was a problem, that they handled it incorrectly, and that they were multiple
by eykanal 15y ago
Their statement actually isn't nearly as bad as you imply. They mention that there was a problem, that they handled it incorrectly, and that they were multiple conflicting factors associated. They even admit at the end (again) that they were wrong. It's short, sweet, and to the point. I think on the scale of 1 to horrible, this is pretty far from horrible.
- jfoutz 15y agoI'd just like to point out the docs for using donate buttons (https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin?cmd=_render-content&content_ID=developer/e_howto_html_donation_buttons&bn_r=o https://cms.paypal.com/us/cgi-bin?cmd=_render-content&co...) makes no mention of "clear guidelines for any business that uses PayPal to accept donations" i couldn't come up with those guidelines on a paypal search. so, it seems pretty horrible to me. It's fine to have rules, it's horrible to have secret rules you don't tell people about. They don't ask for documentation of non-profit status, or any of that. Just, here's a button! good luck!