>Now if you mean I'm making an assumption about a candidate That was even more obvious than the sports and cognition fact. Here's the thing: you're doing the

>Now if you mean I'm making an assumption about a candidate That was even more obvious than the sports and cognition fact. Here's the thing: you're doing the exact thing that caused the problem in the first place. Creating thought experiments and narrating them at length regarding scenarios which are a rarity, given a problem which occurs frequently, in an environment with thousands of other variables. In a world where we do in fact have better indicators which are still not used, despite being well researched. We have plenty of options remaining before we need to be this nitpicky.