3 ms·
I almost choked when I saw the headline with that judgement, and I haven't looked into it, but I suspect part of the reason it went so high is because he and hi
by jhauris 4y ago
I almost choked when I saw the headline with that judgement, and I haven't looked into it, but I suspect part of the reason it went so high is because he and his lawyers got caught withholding evidence in discovery and perjurying themselves.
My optimistic belief is the high judgement was due to those extra factors, but maybe a lawyer can correct me.
- ncmncm 4y agoYou charge enough to discourage the behavior. Evidently, a smaller amount did not suffice.
- CodeSgt 4y agoYes. Don't say things that the public disagrees with. Don't question what you're told. That's the lesson. Of course I think the Sandy Hook shooting was real, but if someone said it wasn't I'd just think they're an idiot - not a criminal that should be tried in any court.
- jhauris 4y agoHe wasn't tried as a criminal. This was a civil case between private individuals, under defamation laws. Withholding evidence and perjury, however, are actual crimes.