3 ms·
That makes me wonder if I could do so with my 1966 South Bend...but then I think I'd probably finish the cylinder bore with a cheap Chinese Reamer, which is not
by Damogran6 4y ago
That makes me wonder if I could do so with my 1966 South Bend...but then I think I'd probably finish the cylinder bore with a cheap Chinese Reamer, which is not something he would have probably wanted to purchase for a one off operation. (Think $300 for a cutting tool, vs one I can buy today for $25)
You bore thecylinder to rough dimension, then use the reamer to set it to final tolerance.
- grogenaut 4y agoWhen making a real steam engine you use piston rings, you don't really machine to exact tolerance except where you're showing off how precise you are. The rings are consumable, they also flex since they're split rings (they're a C), which lets them expand as they wear. They're usually softer material or a slide compatible material with the cylinder walls. This makes them sacrificial and saves the much more expensive cylinder. You see them in literally every modern engine and I'm sure absurdly far back, even though they have better precision now. Your 1966 south bend is likely several orders of magnitude better than that emco, those things are more meant for wood, and imagine if you needed to align your spindle on your lathe every time you used it how inaccurate it'd be.