Seems pretty easy to understand. No one is claiming that nuclear is a permanent solution, they are claiming that is a solution we have right now that can produc

Seems pretty easy to understand. No one is claiming that nuclear is a permanent solution, they are claiming that is a solution we have right now that can produce more than enough to meet our needs for at least a century if not a lot more. I've also never seen anyone say that we should use only nuclear and ban using renewables, their argument is usually exactly what you just stated, that we should use a combination of solutions which would naturally include nuclear.