3 ms·
Well their companies bought defective equipment, and now wants someone else to pay but not using a resource that the airplane companies are using for free. I s
by msh 4y ago
Well their companies bought defective equipment, and now wants someone else to pay but not using a resource that the airplane companies are using for free.
I see 3 solutions:
1: shut down 5G.
2: Ground airplanes with defective equipment
3: Make the airplane companies pay for the spectrum that their defective equipment needs to operate.
Option 2 would satisfy flying safely and not put externalities on companies that had no fault in this. 3 also would but would not be very efficient.
- mellavora 4y ago> Well their companies bought defective equipment No they didn't. The equipment worked just fine until people started broadcasting on a nearby frequency. Like if I put a jammer outside your living room window and your WiFi stopped working, would that be because you bought 'defective equipment'? After all, your router doesn't have the latest 'anti-jamming' error correcting codes built in.
- msh 4y agoUnless I misunderstand the altimeters did not live up to the required specifications when they were produced, but as the nearby spectrum was not in use nobody really cared about this.
- darksaints 4y agoIt wasn't the equipment working fine that made it defective. It was the fact that they were using frequencies hundreds of MHz away from what they were allowed to use.
- blantonl 4y agoThe equipment is indeed defective. If your receiver is able to be overloaded by adjacent channel interference because you as the designed neglected to install a bandpass filter on such a critical piece of equipment, and it wasn't discovered until later when someone legally was granted a license to use adjacent spectrum, your equipment is WILDLY defective. Just because it took many many years to identify the failure doesn't give the manufacturers a pass. A jammer is a malicious, unlicensed product specifically designed to prevent your Wifi from working.