The acceptance rate is >50% and it lets lots of fake and pseudoscience trough. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/more-scientific-reports-and-faked-pape

The acceptance rate is >50% and it lets lots of fake and pseudoscience trough. https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/more-scientific-reports-and-faked-papers https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/more-scientific-re.... >It's a good thing for science Maybe, but we should treat them like arXiv.org type e-Print archive. People are posting them to HN and thinking that because it's Nature.com site it's solid science.