3 ms·
Some comments are out of touch with reality. I genuinely don't understand how you are not explicitly addressing the massive corporates and multinational compani
by laylower 4y ago
Some comments are out of touch with reality. I genuinely don't understand how you are not explicitly addressing the massive corporates and multinational companies that actually *do* have protection and an entrenched position. Some of these layoffs are happening in companies that are posting record earnings and profits. Let's not be naive about it.
Certain comments seem to argue for labor liberalism while at the same time retaining preferential treatment for these larger companies. You cannot have it both ways. Either create a truly capitalistic society that allows defaults, free movement of people and capital, create an even playing field for workers or by default lose some of the human capital flexibility that is necessitated by the current corrupt and broken system.
- ttoinou 4y agoYes, true (in the european sense) liberalism at all levels is better than only labor liberalism + legal protections of current companies. But it is still better than "protected" employment + legal protections of current companies