4 ms·
Both are better than doing nothing. It's generally much easier to find time for 15 minutes of X than 60 minutes of Y. In HN terms, you are arguing about which
by rmgraham 15y ago
Both are better than doing nothing.
It's generally much easier to find time for 15 minutes of X than 60 minutes of Y.
In HN terms, you are arguing about which type of balanced tree is better but are ignoring the fact the data is only 100 items long and you're much better off just pushing out your MVP than agonizing over the inefficiency of one over the other.
- ebbv 15y agoYou are right that either is better than nothing. But the bad advice that "lifting is the way to go, cardio doesn't work" is very common and it needs to be corrected.