Please sustain your claim that there isn't science into the study of human evolution. Some rigor is indeed possible, it's pretty easy to say there isn't looking

Please sustain your claim that there isn't science into the study of human evolution. Some rigor is indeed possible, it's pretty easy to say there isn't looking from the outside. Sure you can't apply fancy statistics or mathematical proof. But just to sustain that by not doing it you don't have nothing to gain from a study more serious that Harari's is a big claim that needs justification. Also your claim about Harari's conjecture being somehow relevant because Putin is a dictator is just meaningless. A note: I find it disturbing that an historian is so much paid and supported by various questionable people. The politicisation might be just there. Why is he the only historian paid that much, while at the same time providing a view of history no other historian agrees to (in serious publications)?