It seems to me like an internal affair. I'm not an NYU student, so I can't possibly pass judgement, but I have been to university and had absolutely rubbish lec

It seems to me like an internal affair. I'm not an NYU student, so I can't possibly pass judgement, but I have been to university and had absolutely rubbish lecturers who have no interest in how they're perceived and just deliver material badly in various ways. I've seen abusive educators who express open dislike of their job and students in the classroom and who brag about giving them a hard time too. I ended up changing my degree to get away from awful lecturers - I was cheated. I would still rather have been the thing I originally signed up for, than what I became. Even after, for several of my classes, I ended up watching them online because it was necessary to watch them multiple times to understand what the lecturer said. These people exist, it doesn't seem like a stretch to me. If I'm paying as much as a house for my education, I should have a right to express myself about how it is provided to me. If that many students felt like he wasn't delivering the material well, and the university considered it and made a choice, then fair enough. People get fired all the time for not doing their jobs well, particularly in America. Look how they treat waiters, where a portion of pay is directly correlated to customer satisfaction. What I don't understand is why this topic is worth dozens of outraged articles.