3 ms·
For all that, he is less dangerous than Malcolm Gladwell.
by ncmncm 4y ago
For all that, he is less dangerous than Malcolm Gladwell.
- Vibgyor5 4y agoGenuinely curious, why what's wrong with Gladwell?
- kirkules 4y agoIf you didn't know what it means to "sensationalize", you could either consult a dictionary or read anything by Malcolm Gladwell
- ncmncm 4y agoHe is very good at sounding reasonable. But he very strongly believes in might makes right, and that rich people deserve all they have, and that whatever they want, everyone should want for them. In an interview, he explains that he hates that people root for the underdog. In his view, whoever is on top is there because that is where they belong. Period. He is far from alone in this, but is much better than most at dressing it up for public consumption.