2 ms·
Why "of all things"? The Economist has always been in favor of free trade -- why not of drugs?
by jhbadger 4y ago
Why "of all things"? The Economist has always been in favor of free trade -- why not of drugs?
- slothtrop 4y agoThe Economist has always been among the most status-quo / neo-liberal publications. They've supported "free trade" in one capacity i.e. globalization, but have not always supported legalization of narcotics (they appear to have been for years, but it's been around far longer, since 1843).