> homeless population there is more threatening question was about the Bay area, and you are talking about SF, so obviously this doesn't include east Bay? even

> homeless population there is more threatening question was about the Bay area, and you are talking about SF, so obviously this doesn't include east Bay? even parts of SF itself seems pretty threatening these days and crime is pretty extreme in SF. south bay/SJ doesn't seem as bad (except for East PA and parts of SJ) > not really sure where else people would recommend without extreme lifestyle shift. Are these the only two places in the United States worth living in?