5 ms·
Yeah, Julia probably has a similar number of users as Rust - they just don't inject it into every breath they exhale like Rust users do.
by chaxor 4y ago
Yeah, Julia probably has a similar number of users as Rust - they just don't inject it into every breath they exhale like Rust users do.
- AnimalMuppet 4y agoNot saying you're wrong, but... do you have any source for saying that Julia has as many users as Rust?
- williamstein 4y agoOn TIOBE, Julia (27) and Rust (20) are relatively close right now, and TIOBE might have some correlation to number of users. https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/ https://www.tiobe.com/tiobe-index/
- cutler 4y agoTIOBE's methodology is a joke. I'm surprised it gets a mention on a forum like HN which tends to attract the sharpest minds in the industry.
- pittmajp 4y agoWe sure are all great on here aren’t we? Plaudits to everyone involved.
- Tozen 4y agoIf you look at the IEEE top programming language list, it is still close. Believe it's Rust ranked #20 to Julia's rank of #28 (if my count is correct). https://spectrum.ieee.org/top-programming-languages-2022 https://spectrum.ieee.org/top-programming-languages-2022 And if you compare the IEEE to the TIOBE list, there appears to be a high degree of correlation. I think part of the criticism against TIOBE, is when people's favorite is not doing as well as they would like or a language they don't like is doing better than they expected.
- tpoacher 4y agoThe author of this tool commented below; Julia simply wasn't included in the list. Plugging it in gives it quite a high score compared to other languages (top ten in 2/3 categories). Anecdotally, I feel like I see article "on" julia at least as often as rust on HN. I totally expected it to come "second" on most categories, and was very surprised not to see it there. Then I realised that most julia articles would rarely introduce the julia component as "in Julia"; certaintly not in the same way that people tinkering with rust would be keen to report it as such. If anything I have noticed that most articles on Julia tend to be a bit backdoorish (i.e. the title is on, say, differentiation, but then you go to the article and it's basically an article about julia). So I think it's just a side-effect of the methodology used to rank languages; not sure if it reflects actual market-share or the result of a vocal community engaging HN specifically, but julia definitely has a much stronger presence on HN than implied by this tool/article.