4 ms·
If you look at the POSIX standard that removes fgrep & egrep [1], then you can see that most of the utilities being removed there really are quite obscure thing
by gnfargbl 4y ago
If you look at the POSIX standard that removes fgrep & egrep [1], then you can see that most of the utilities being removed there really are quite obscure things.
In light of that, then another (perhaps more charitable) way to look at it is that the maintainers are keen to clean up stuff that they perceive as old cruft, and perhaps don't realise quite how ingrained these particular pieces of "cruft" are into the ecosystem.
(On the other hand: the same POSIX link specifies the removal of cpio and, uh, tar. I'm not sure I see that last one flying.)
[1] https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu_chap04.html https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/9699919799/xrat/V4_xcu...
- jws 4y ago”removal of cpio and, uh, tar” They’ve finally figured out how to make people use pax.
- wnissen 4y agoNo `tar`? BURN. IT. ALL. DOWN. Dear God, what could they possibly be thinking? People are capable of making changes, I think we've all switched from `more` to `less`, *csh to more modern shells, etc., and if `pax` is really all that I'm happy to switch. But removing tar is insane.