4 ms·
They should have changed stuff up well before this point. If you want to question someone’s vestment then do that at least a year before that date and get serio
by ianai 4y ago
They should have changed stuff up well before this point. If you want to question someone’s vestment then do that at least a year before that date and get serious about demanding results from the problematic employee at that point. That way they’ve got 3-6 months to perform and you’ve got time to terminate for lack of performance.
Doing it when the vestment date comes up just reeks of shortsightedness to the point of vindictiveness. Immaturity.
If it’s like the person quit but kept coming to work for the last month before vestment then talk to them and maybe offer to buy them out if they’ve got no good explanations.
- knorker 4y ago> They should have changed stuff up well before this point. Agreed. We don't have all the facts but management is not without blame. > Doing it when the vestment date comes up just reeks of shortsightedness to the point of vindictiveness. Immaturity. I've made my point repeatedly that the gains from paying it out are also shortsigted and may not be worth it, so no need to repeat. Compensating people who don't deserve it pisses people off. Maybe those people are immature, but they do include your best performers too. Like I said, no perfect solution. Management (arguably) caused the situation, and there's no perfect fix.