3 ms·
Bad visually? Or bad in terms of user-experience? Or in terms of overall utility? For whom? VRChat and RecRoom both are arguably "metaverses" (although we jus
by andybak 4y ago
Bad visually? Or bad in terms of user-experience?
Or in terms of overall utility? For whom?
VRChat and RecRoom both are arguably "metaverses" (although we just called it "social VR" pre-hype) and have pretty healthy usage numbers. The latter is more of a games hub but all these apps are a mix of different use-cases so not a clear distinction. (Consider Fortnite which is now social but was originally just a multiplayer game)
There's a debate to be had about aesthetics - some of that boils down to taste. But you can't argue that all social VR apps are useless.
EDIT - wording tweaks
- dmitriid 4y ago> But you can't argue that all social VR apps are useless. I'm not arguing that. I think I pretty clearly stated what I meant. Everything else is you arguing with someone else.
- andybak 4y agoYou said: > No legs was just a symbol for how bad the whole thing is in general: That isn't terribly clear to me at all. "How bad" in what way? What is "the whole thing"? The links you provided are comparing two apps. I presume you prefer one to the other. I'm guessing the reason is visual..? But I'm not sure. I was actually hoping for some more clarity from you.