14 ms·
> Edit: I see downvotes. But no one can answer the question.. . You likely would have had fewer downvotes if you had just answered in earnest the question aske
by axiolite 4y ago
> Edit: I see downvotes. But no one can answer the question.. .
You likely would have had fewer downvotes if you had just answered in earnest the question asked: "Are you asking a question or being dismissive and flippant?" Then maybe you would have gotten an answer or two.
Instead, choosing to reply with inflammatory language like "you couldn’t truthfully answer the question" seem to indicate you are probably not interested in any ration discussion, but are instead going to dig in and dismiss or attack anyone who disagrees with you. Certainly doesn't make me want to spend any time explaining the bleeding obvious to you, but perhaps someone else will.
- scarface74 4y agoAnd yet, you also are unable to answer the question…
- axiolite 4y ago> And yet, you also are unable to answer the question… Correction: Unwilling. Not unable. This is an important distinction. I'm simply unwilling to engage in a lengthy discussion with you, on any topic really, based on your uncivil behavior here.
- scarface74 4y agoYes because the original question I replied to was > Are you asking a question or being dismissive and flippant? You'd don't really need to think very hard to figure it out now ... do you. Was the model of civility and “assumed positive intent” And you still couldn’t answer the question…nor has anyone else including the original poster who went silent…