> Point to data, and folks still try to justify why unions bad (anecdotes, deflection, etc.). As with most thing, unions have both good points and bad points.

> Point to data, and folks still try to justify why unions bad (anecdotes, deflection, etc.). As with most thing, unions have both good points and bad points. Your comment reads like it's saying "we can show they are objectively better with data, but (mistaken) people still try to justify why they're bad". It comes across, to me at least, as intentionally misleading.