> Probability is an abstract concept so if he has a really good model of the universe there is no reason he couldn’t have better information. It's not about re

> Probability is an abstract concept so if he has a really good model of the universe there is no reason he couldn’t have better information. It's not about reasoning. Sure he could have better information but this isn't the point. It's all about WHY probability works. Why are these laws suddenly obeyed when there's a lack of information? Do we assume it's fundamental? Or can the laws of probability be derived from deeper axioms, like logic.